Adobe Creative Suite 5 Master Collection
Sunday, August 01, 2010
   
Text Size

Type a word for instant results

subscribe

Attitudes to water reuse need recycling

RECYCLED water has not led to human illness anywhere in the world, clearing the way for Western Australia to increase its reliance on reuse of wastewater, a recent Perth forum was told.

csiro_em4121.jpg
Preparing wastewater samples for analysis at CSIRO's Floreat Laboratory / Image courtesy of CSIRO
Dr Simon Toze, Principal Research Scientist with CSIRO’s Water for a Healthy Country project, said there was a high degree of confidence among scientists that modern water treatment processes could safely filter out microbial pathogens to a level where they were no longer harmful to human health.

As a result, he said there was great scope for increasing the country's use of wastewater, including harvesting more stormwater, treating industrial discharges, re-using grey water in homes from laundry and bathroom water and even treating sewage effluent for a range of uses - but not necessarily for drinking.

Dr Toze said research was now at the fine-tuning stage of improving water quality.

He said water in Australia was treated to such a high level that it would be regarded as excessive by some overseas proponents of recycling.

Although not yet widely used in Australia, water recycling had been practised in a managed, scientific way since the 1920-30s in many parts of Europe and North America, according to Dr Toze.

“In all the work done in the world, nobody has ever brought up a health risk where somebody has fallen sick from recycled water,” he said.

“We don't believe it is a problem.”

He said the science was now focusing improving the efficiency of water treatment processes by reducing energy costs and greenhouse gases.

Other research was looking into how the filtering effects of reservoirs and aquifers removed pathogens.

He added that Australia did not necessarily have to go so far as to recycle sewage directly into drinking water, as was being successfully done in Namibia.

Instead, he said we could look at using treated recycled water to recharge acquifers in a properly managed way.

“It can be treated to a level where it can be put back into a reservoir or aquifer and eventually, 10 or 15 years later, it comes back into the drinking water,” he said.

Dr Toze, a microbiologist, has focused his research on the behaviour of microbial pathogens in groundwater and biogeochemical changes following managed aquifer recharge.

He has responsibility for the management and research direction of projects with a combined value of more than $6 million, in particular, two recent projects co-funded by the WA Premier’s Water Foundation, Water Corporation and CSIRO.

Dr Toze was among speakers at a forum looking into the use of wastewater recycling held at the University of Western Australia on March 14.

Other speakers included former Toowoomba Mayor Dianne Thorley, who made national headlines with her push to introduce recycled sewage into the Queensland town's drinking water.

Despite the Toowoomba community voting against the proposal in a 2006 referendum, the city will be connected to Brisbane’s recycled water supply by 2009 as part of a Queensland State Government initiative announced in January.

The Conservation Council of WA's Water Policy Officer, Steven McKiernan, said he hoped the forum would help the WA Government to see that it was possible to improve on its target of sourcing 30 per cent of the State's water supply from recycled water by 2030.

He said a two-pronged attack was needed, focusing on reducing water usage per person, and increasing reliance on recycled water.

Mr McKiernan pointed out that not all wastewater needed to be treated to drinking level.

Semi-treated recycled water could be piped into homes for jobs where grey water was sufficient, he said. This had been done in a South Australian community where recycled water was piped into a new housing community in specially coloured pipes separate from drinking water, so that the recycled water could be used for watering gardens and laundry, instead of wasting drinking water on these chores, he said.

Communities should also have small treatment plants to enable using recycled water on public open spaces such as ovals and other sporting grounds, he said.

Industry could also make much greater use of recycled wastewater, he said.

“You don't need potable water for a lot of processing or for dust suppression in mine sites,” he said.

Comments (4)Add Comment
0
...
written by Frank Prokop, April 02, 2008
Interesting and progressive thinking....
So it is therefore fascinating that the so-called water managers in Western Australia are so paranoid about recreational access to our water supply dams.
Ok to drink recycled water, but if someone wants to throw a lure in the water the world will end????
Hypocrisy?? No much more insidious than that!!!
0
...
written by Laurence Jones, April 03, 2008
I thought that CSIRO was independent? Simon Toze and CSIRO have been trying to force the introduction of treated sewage effluent 'directly' into the public's drinking water supply mains since 1995.

CSIRO has done this by using their partnership in CIRM, which has been operating since 1993, only recently abandoned.

Now that Simon has assured us that it is safe to drink treated sewage effluent, CSIRO, Griffith University and University of Qld can give back the $50 million research funding they recently received from the Qld State Government to carry out research into the reuse of treated sewage effluent for human consumption.

Simon failed to mention that what is planned here in Qld is a world first.

No country, worldwide, consumes treated sewage effluent sourced from hospitals, industry, homes and abattoirs, indirectly or directly inserted into their drinking water supply mains.

No long term health studies have ever been carried out on any community consuming treated sewage effluent using the source water proposed here, and at the % to be used here, up to 100% as confirmed by Premier Anna Bligh.

Prof Paul Greenfield also confirmed this is a world first.

Windhoek only used domestic sewage, Singapore only uses 1% of treated sewage effluent sourced 95% from domestic sources.

The old Windhoek plant is now used for non potable reuse and the owners were involved in a court case over the amount of chemicals used, while the new plant has suffered closures and explosions.

Dr Toze's opinion also flies in the face of numerous studies and scientific opinion that throw doubt over health issues related to its use for drinking purposes.

One must remember that Dr Toze is a a microbiologist and his research has been focused on that side of things.

Furthermore, I believe that CSIRO has shown bias while unfairly promoting the introduction of this concept, something I have been following for eleven years now.

I also believe that CSIRO'S promotion raises serious ethical concerns.
0
...
written by Rae McPherson, April 04, 2008
I have always wondered why we add water to human waste and make so much faecal/urine-contaminated water in the first place. If we looked at changing over to composting toilet systems to deal with human waste, then we would have plenty of water to drink that was never blackwater in the first place. In any water audit, the amount of water that is physically consumed by people is very small compared to all the other uses for water in the home.
0
...
written by Brickbat for WA's EPA, April 04, 2008
In 2006, the EPA called for public submissions on the Water Corporation's Managed Aquifer Recharge proposal which proposed using treated wastewater to recharge one of Perth's potable groundwater aquifers. In my submission, I asked the EPA to include in its final report a summary of what projects are operating around the world using treated sewage water to supplement potable supplies. Sadly, the EPA chose to ignore this request so that a person reading their report could gain the impression that the use of recycled wastewater as was being proposed here in WA was new and different and needing to be evaluated without recourse to what must be lots of information available from many other parts of the world. In turn, to many readers, this would have suggested that there were many serious and as yet unresolved problems facing the use of recycled wastewater in WA.
Thank you to Simon Toze for bringing WA into the modern world and how unfortunate that WA's EPA did not avail itself of the opportunity to better inform the people of this state on what has been proven to be a safe practice in many places outside WA for many years.

Write comment
smaller | bigger

busy

Visit the Astronomy WA website

Science permeates most aspects of human endeavour, and it is therefore imperative that the wider community has the opportunity to understand the values and methodology of science and technology. Scientists have a professional responsibility to communicate scientific ideas and knowledge to the community.

John de Laeter, Curtin University

 

> Privacy
> Copyright and material re-use
> Editorial


ScienceNetwork WA is a collaboration between Scitech and the Government of Western Australia

Network activity

We have 605 guests online
Scitech Government of Western Australia, Department of Commerce

Administration

Postal: PO Box 1155, West Perth
Western Australia 6872
Telephone: +61 8 9215 0734

Website developed by Scitech

Login