In this ScienceNetwork WA opinion piece, the CEO from the Cooperative Research Centre for Future Farm Industries (FFI CRC), Kevin Goss, explains why measures need to be put in place to ensure farmers remain productive and sustainable in a drying climate.

THE fact is that Western Australia will experience a drying climate in coming years which will severely affect agriculture no matter how quickly climate change policy is implemented. Current estimates expect climate change to cause a productivity loss in agriculture of about 9 per cent by 2050.

Even when mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions starts to take effect, the climate will still continue to change.

In Western Australia, the areas where climate change is going to hit hardest are the northern and eastern wheatbelt. If predictions are right, these areas are going to experience more often the crop failures and severe wind erosion experienced in early 2007.

However, Australian agriculture isn’t a faultless victim of global warming. On the contrary, it plays a significant part in the problem. In fact, 16 per cent of global warming emissions are attributable to human activity caused by agriculture.

Therefore the challenge for Western Australian farmers is to simultaneously cope with the onset of climate change while contributing to solutions by reducing or offsetting its own greenhouse gas emissions.

Of concern to me is the climate change policy discussion currently underway in Australia – a discussion which is heavily skewed towards climate modelling, seasonal forecasting and impact analysis.

Not enough work is being planned or done on the more immediate options required by farmers as part of the ongoing adaption and adjustment needed to effectively manage the climate change risk in agriculture.

The balance of the policy discussion should also be questioned. The focus on the big policy issues of emission targets and a national emissions trading scheme is a distraction from the immediate concerns facing Australian agriculture.

While there are legitimate concerns about agriculture facing unintended consequences under emissions reduction policy, there are also unrealistic expectations that agriculture can buy its way out through carbon offsets and credits.

The requirements for tradeable carbon permits will be very stringent and require security of sequestration for decades. This is beyond the resources of most farmers; however, improved farming systems that reduce greenhouse gas emissions can be within their reach.

Already, there are farming systems and new plant technologies being developed that are better adapted to drought and erratic rainfall. In essence, the first steps in making Australian farming systems ready for a drying climate have already been made.

Their performance under drought and unusual seasonal conditions suffered in recent years have given us pointers on how to create more productive, environmentally friendly farming systems better suited to drier climates.

The evidence we have gathered so far has shown there is greater year round plant growth, higher production, greater water use, more profit and better natural resource management outcomes. Some of these plants are new to Australian agriculture; others are native, with some containing beneficial nutritional and dietary compounds.

Much of our research into finding new farming systems suited to a drier climate is happening in Western Australia.

A plant that has captured the attention and imagination of our plant breeders is Bituminaria bituminous, a perennial pasture legume originally from the harsh climate of the Canary Islands, it has stayed green all summer and thrived in unseasonal summer rain for the last two years at trial sites in Newdegate and Buntine.

Another promising perennial pasture legume is Cullen, a straggly-looking Australian native plant that has good nutritional value and grows well in the low rainfall areas of the Western Australian wheatbelt.

Western Australian agriculture is particularly vulnerable to the effects of climate change. But there is every indication that adaptation can significantly reduce these impacts and those new farming systems can underpin farm adjustment and productivity to further offset the effects.

It is imperative that we act now and invest in innovation, research and development, and engage in collaboration to create adaptive farming systems for mixed cropping and grazing that will give farmers new options to remain productive.

Western Australia already has the capacity to lead the way through the application of good science to make the changes necessary that will prepare Australian agriculture for a drier climate.

Kevin Goss
Chief Executive Officer
Future Farm Industries CRC

Comments (2)

Subscribe to this comment's feed

...
written by michael kiely, May 05, 2008

The Future Farm Industries CRC is a welcome addition to the list of CRCs send to help we farmers. It proves that someone cares. This paper also proves that farmers need to be more engaged with scientists to help them 'do' better science. "Carbon Farmers" across Australia have been developing new farming systems to conserve water and reduce erosion, etc. for the last decade. These systems have been based on native perennials and new cropping techniques. But science failed to notice and, when asked to compile an inventory of emissions sinks and sources for agriculture, it failed to include carbon sequestering land management techniques in the studies. Hence the furphy that our soils are incapable of capturing or holding significant amounts of carbon. There is no science that supports this contention because no scientific authority had seen fit to study "carbon farming" until the Carbon Coalition pointed out the gaps in the data sets used to create the Australian Greenhouse Accounting System. Trials are underway now, a bit too late for soils to be included in the Emissions Trading Scheme. (But scientists don't need science to know our soils are too old and buggered to capture much carbon, do they?) The collaborative model of farmer/scientist partnership being endorsed by the Carbon Coalition aims to assist scientists develop more realistic methodologies and to help farmers become better lab assistants. We need better science because we're all in this together.

• 
• +0
• 
• 

...
written by Damir Ibrisimovic, May 14, 2008

There are many ways we can help our farmers. One of them I outlined at http://www.sciencealert.com.au...7248.html.
I must say, however, that scientific community moves slowly. It seems easy to point out a problem, but even when a solution is presented there are very few willing to roll up their sleaves. Shouldnt we at least start thinking even if there is no government funding?

• 
• +0
• 
• 

Name

Email

Comment

smaller | bigger

Add Comment Preview